On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: > I presume CKSEG is CKSEG0 in the above patch. With that it works > about the same as before. So do you have any clue what the problem > behind all that really is? Furthermore I still have all those > "Illegal instruction" and "Segmentation fault" messages that > shouldn't be there. Sorry, yes I indeed meant CKSEG0. And this version of the patch really was only meant to optimize the large performance impact your previous patch had; it wasn't meant to fix anything beyond that. As I can't replicate your configuration I'm still starring at the code to find what's wrong ... Ralf
