On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:43:19PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > 2.0 requires different workarounds which are already in place and functional > > since quite some time. We still lacking a fix for one important erratum of > > the 2.0 but it seems pretty stable without. > > Well, I can actually see two problems: #4 that is fairly easy to handle > and #7 which is painful and which is unfortunately present with the R4700 > as well. If #7 would only affect the R4700 the world would peachy ... To my knowledge the dusty box here in a corner is the only R4700 that ever ran Linux ... Under a different bug number this bug also affects the R4600 V1.x; it's fixed in post-2.0 R4600 (which all identify as 2.0) and post-1.1 R4700. Since a workaround may be a bit performance sensitive I think I'll try if it can be probed for reliably. Ralf
