On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:55:43PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:45:49AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Not everyone uses your MIPS patches; I have a completely functional > > MIPS system with: > > 0019df30 l O .data 000011b8 _new_sys_errlist > > 0019df30 l O .data 000001ec _old_sys_errlist > > It doesn't tell anything. Please, please show size of sys_errlist in > glibc 2.0 for mips. I am not even sure if you can run mips binaries > compiled against glibc 2.0 with glibc 2.2/2.3. I didn't use 2.0 for MIPS either. And I got the wrong impression from your last message; sorry! Here's what my MIPS glibc has: 0019df30 g DO .data 000001ec (GLIBC_2.0) sys_errlist 0019df30 g DO .data 000011b8 GLIBC_2.2 sys_errlist 0019df30 g DO .data 000001ec (GLIBC_2.0) _sys_errlist 0019df30 g DO .data 000011b8 GLIBC_2.2 _sys_errlist So: I don't know where the GLIBC_2.1 version came from, or why we need a GLIBC_2.3 version, or why we should change the size of the GLIBC_2.0 version. Your patch looks good; should you wipe the GLIBC_2.1 version also? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
