On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:41:32PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:36:58PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > You know better than I what existing mips libc.so.6 ABIs have for the size > > of sys_errlist. But for the current version, 123 omits many of the errno > > values I see in asm-mips/errno.h, and EDQUOT really is 1133. So I don't > > see how your change can be right. > > That is what was in glibc 2.0 for mips. However, glibc 2.2 is the first > glibc version I worked on. I don't have any mips binaries compiled > against glibc 2.0. As far as I know, none of glibc prior to the one > with all my mips patches applied ever worked 100% correct on mips. Not everyone uses your MIPS patches; I have a completely functional MIPS system with: 0019df30 l O .data 000011b8 _new_sys_errlist 0019df30 l O .data 000001ec _old_sys_errlist (That's 1134*4 in the new one and 123*4 in the older one). There's a lot of these beasts deployed and I'd hate to see an incompatible change now! -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
