On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Here is a new version that takes your recent mips64 cache code rearrange > into account. OK to apply? I'm not sure if that's really a good idea. Technically it's ok but I expect users of the R4000 to missconfigure their kernels. So I wonder if it might be more appropriate to have just automatically enabled this workaround for systems that are affected? If we keep it user-selectable then we at least want a safety check somewhere in the startup code telling users to rebuild their code with the workaround enabled. Having this workaround enabled by default would also ensure Linux distributions ship working code - you don't want users having to recompile their whole distribution ... > BTW, how about renaming r5k-sc.c to sc-r5k.c for consistency? Yes. Though there's a bit of confusion hidden there - the Indy SC code is named ip22-sc.c - but that at least in a different directory. Ralf
