Re: Delayed jumps and branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gareth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have been going through my mips architecture book learning about the delay
> slots used in loads, jumps and branches and I am in need of some clarification.
> The instruction just after the jump instruction is always executed wether the
> jump is taken or not, right?

There are no conditional jumps, so you are right. :-)

> So the compiler can re-aarange the assembly to
> take advantage of this, but if no instruction (that can be executed wether the
> jump is taken or not) can be placed after the jump, a nop is used intstead. So
> take this code for example :
> 
>     jal <my_function>
>     li  $s2, 3
>     li  $v0, 2

The register name is either "$2" or "v0".

> If the jump is not taken, it requires 3 cycles to execute these 3 instructions.
> If the jump is taken, it requires 3 cycles to execute the first instruction of
> my_function, and li $s2, 3 is executed.
> 
> Is my reasoning correct?

Yes, if it was e.g.

	beq	t0, zero, <my_function>

instead of jal. Note that the "branch likely" variants don't execute the
delay slot if not taken.


Thiemo


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux