"Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@cotw.com> writes:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I finally understand. Can you send a new patch for glibc with an
> > update for the FAQ? I'll add it this time.
> >
> diff -urN glibc-2.2.3/sysdeps/mips/rtld-ldscript.in glibc-2.2.3-patched/sysdeps/
> mips/rtld-ldscript.in
> --- glibc-2.2.3/sysdeps/mips/rtld-ldscript.in Sat Jul 12 18:23:14 1997
> +++ glibc-2.2.3-patched/sysdeps/mips/rtld-ldscript.in Sun Apr 29 22:32:35 2001
> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> -OUTPUT_FORMAT("@@rtld-oformat@@")
> OUTPUT_ARCH(@@rtld-arch@@)
> ENTRY(@@rtld-entry@@)
> SECTIONS
>
>
> There's the patch. It's not much but it is correct. I have built multiple
But it's not complete. AFAIK remember you posted a patch with some
more changes and HJ even suggested to remove the rtld-ldscript.in file.
> toolchains and such using this patch. GCC out of CVS both the 3.0 and
> cutting edge branch work without patches for Linux. And as mentioned
> earlier, binutils is already fixed. As far as FAQ update...what do you
> want?
I need an update for the FAQ that explains which binutils version is
required for MIPS and I prefer to have a test that checks on
MIPS-Linux for the correct emulation in ld.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
