Re: Possible follow-ups...

[Gerry Hickman <gerry1@dircon.co.uk>]

> > What is really bad is where you get mixed up between "sent" and
> > "received" date.

> Is "sent" that actual message header field name?  Received fields
> provide the date that a message was actually received by the system.

No sorry, I'm referring to the difference between the "date" field, and
the "received" header. As far as I know the "date" field is the date the
message was sent.

> You may want experiment with the DATEFIELDS resource.

Yes, I'm using that and it works perfectly. I was merely pointing out
the issue in case others were not aware of it :)

-- 
Gerry Hickman (London UK)