On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:30:52PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > >> Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6, > >> NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and > >> found no problems. > > > > Thanks once again for your testing. I'll send a pull request to Dave in > > the morning. > > Thanks very much! > > (CC: Wensong) > I guess it would make sense to start hosting the new ipvsadm version > somewhere on http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ soon. It could still > be marked as unstable and saying, "If you intend to use the > experimental IPv6 support for IPVS introduced in kernel 2.6.XX, you > will need this new version of ipvsadm: ...". Also, we can then point > to it in the Kconfig help text in CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6. What do you > think? Yes I agree. It would be good to start hosting tarballs of the new/unstable/experimental version of ipvsadm on www.linuxvirtualserver.org. Wensong, can we also host some sort of repository for ipvsadm on linuxvirtualserver.org? If not, I guess the next most logical choice would be to use kernel.org. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
