On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: >> Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6, >> NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and >> found no problems. > > Thanks once again for your testing. I'll send a pull request to Dave in > the morning. Thanks very much! (CC: Wensong) I guess it would make sense to start hosting the new ipvsadm version somewhere on http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ soon. It could still be marked as unstable and saying, "If you intend to use the experimental IPv6 support for IPVS introduced in kernel 2.6.XX, you will need this new version of ipvsadm: ...". Also, we can then point to it in the Kconfig help text in CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6. What do you think? Julius -- Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
