On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:04:20PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The impetus for this series of patches is Julian Anastasov noting >> that "load balance IPv4 connections from a local process" checks >> for 0 TCP checksums. Herbert Xu confirmed that this is not legal, >> even on loopback traffic, but that rather partial checksums are >> possible. >> >> The first patch in this series is a proposed solution to handle >> partial checksums for both TCP and UDP. >> >> The other two patches clean things up a bit. >> >> I have not tested this code beyond compilation yet. > > After extensive testing by Julius Volz and limited testing by myself, I > have applied the first patch, which does indeed allow packets with > PARTIAL_CHECKSUM to work, to lvs-next-2.6. I have dropped the second two > patches which produce bogus checksums. Great, thanks! I have tested TCP+UDP, local+remote clients, v4+v6, NAT+DSR+TUN in all combinations that are expected to be working and found no problems. Julius -- Julius Volz - Corporate Operations - SysOps Google Switzerland GmbH - Identification No.: CH-020.4.028.116-1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
