Marc Weber <marco-oweber@xxxxxx> ezt írta (időpont: 2021. ápr. 13., K, 17:58): > > I created a test with 2 disks then booted without disk2 then without disk1 (each time adding a file. > > Then I booted with both. The result was in kernel logs I found 'mirroring or such' and I only got contents of disk 1. > > > Is there any option to say if both mirrors get changed don't mount but cause an error because that might be better than > > getting newly written data reset randomly ? > > > Did I miss an option? Would mdadm be better ? > > > I tried looking at archives were CPU bottleneck for raids was mentioned often and 'work being done' on it. > > What's status of that or are the advices given there still valid ? > > > Marc Weber > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ > As far as I know mdadm works the same way. (At least it was working like this when this thread happened: https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg36962.html) You can use a similar tactic that was recommended there: Don't assemble a degraded RAID1 array without user interaction. You can do this by changing the activation mode to complete in lvm.conf. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
