David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx> ezt írta (időpont: 2021. ápr. 12., H, 20:47): > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 02:32:52AM +0200, Péter Sárközi wrote: > > Although this is just due to the insane amount of integrity kworker > > processes, and the system is pretty usable, I think it would be much > > nicer to only have 1 sync running on the same physical device at a > > time. > > Create one at a time, waiting for integrity init to finish between them > (sync_percent 100 on each integrity image you see in lvs -a.) > I have some doubt that the end result will perform well enough given the > way you're using the partitions. > Dave > That's what I'm doing right now, it would just be much more convenient to have it set up once and let it finish everything without interaction. This is just a home server, so performance isn't critical, but I don't see why this would perform significantly worse then a whole-disk raid. I'm planning to use the resulting arrays under 1 filesystem without striping. So as long as I'm filling it up I will be hitting 1 array at a time. After it's filled up from the backup and I'm starting to use it as a regular filesystem, continuous reads or writes still gonna hit 1 array at a time most of time so it seems like the same amount of seek and/or parity calculations as with whole disks. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
