Re: Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stuart Gathman schreef op 13-04-2017 14:59:

If you are going to keep snapshots around indefinitely, the thinpools
are probably the way to go.  (What happens when you fill up those?
Hopefully it "freezes" the pool rather than losing everything.)

My experience is that the system crashes.

I have not tested this with a snapshot but a general thin pool overflow crashes the system.

Within half a minute, I think.

It is irrelevant whether the volumes had anything to do with the operation of the system; ie. some mounted volumes that you write to that are in no other use will crash the system.

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux