On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:21:16AM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > All in all, I think that the first approach is the simplest and > therefor the best. > > So how does this look: Better wrt keeping mapped_device out of dm-table.c. But it still has the problem that it treats congestion in any subdevices equally (which may be a good approximation to start with). I'll stick this in my pending queue, and look at it later in the week. I think you're quite close, given that Jens doesn't want the backing_dev pointer in the queue. Thanks, - Joe _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
