Re: dm, dm_table, request_queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:31:08PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> And, in general, do you feel this is the correct solution ?

No, I'm going to do what Jens Axboe suggested and add a congestion
function into the request_queue itself.  dm will therefore provide its
own congestion function that takes the targets into account.  I think
this is the opposite of what you're suggesting, devices look downwards
to their children devices rather than up to their parents.

- Joe

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux