>Ken Fuchs wrote: >> 2) Here's an often neglected fact: The performance of >> the outer cylinders of almost any hard drive (larger >> than a few GB) is usually about double that of the >> inner cylinders of the same drive. Dale Gallagher wrote: >Surely under hardware raid this doesn't apply, as the >location of the data is mirrored/striped across many >disks, so the physical location of data is no longer >obvious? Hardware RAID just makes the physical location of the data just a little harder to determine. Hardware RAID simply transforms n disks of the same size into a larger virtual disk. Hardware RAID will almost certainly combine the outer (lowest) cylinders of all disks together to form the lowest cylinders of the virtual disk and similarly it will combine the inner (highest) cylinders of all disks to form the highest cylinders of the virtual disk. Thus, the lowest cylinders of the hardware RAID virtual disk will be about twice as fast as the highest cylinders of the virtual disk in exactly the same way it would apply to any individual disk in the array. Of course the hardware RAID performance will be much better than a single drive, depending on the actual application. However, it is possible (though very unlikely) that a hardware RAID is set up in a way that eliminates the performance differential between lower and higher cylinders for example by matching lower cylinders of the odd drives with higher cylinders of the even drives. This is an unlikely set up, since the maximum performance of such a RAID would be the same as the average performance of a normal hardware RAID or only 67% of the maximum performance of a normal RAID. Thus, for the typical hardware RAID, one would want to allocate low physical extents to logical volumes needing high performance and higher physical extents to logical volumes with lower performance demands. >> 3) LVM striping can also be used to improve I/O >> performance over two or more spindles (disks). >> Avoid LVM striping over two physical volumes on >> the same spindle (disk), since this reduces >> performance as the system waits for seeks between >> these two physical volumes (for a simple sequential >> access). >Now by using hardware raid, theoretically there may >well be an additional performance gain (increasing in >proportion to the number of spindles of course). Yes, there should be a significant performance increase depending on the application and how well its data accesses are distributed over all spindles in the RAID. However, multiple simultaneous applications may cause more long seeks and in unlikely worst case scenarios, RAID can even perform worst than a like number of independent hard drives, if for example every access requires a (long) seek on all actuators in the RAID. >My original primary concern is the performance impact >the system will experience, particularly if I append >logical extents which are non-contiguous to a LV. Say >for example, the original setup was: >PEs(0-100) for LV /dev/mapper/v0-var-qmail-queue >PEs (101-1000) for LV /dev/mapper/v0-home-mail >And then I find at a later stage that my queue is too >small, so append PEs (1001-1100) to the original LV >/dev/mapper/v0-var-qmail-queue. >Will the performance impact be noticeable, taking into >consideration that each file written to the queue is >sync-ed, together with hardware raid and U320 SCSI disks? For sequential queue access, the physical extent gap should have no noticeable impact on performance. The performance impact on an application doing random access on a logical volume with a large physical extent gap could be noticeable. >I know, it's difficult to assume things up-front, but >I don't want to rush into using LVM for the wrong >reasons... on that note, with hardware raid and the >setup I posted originally, what are the clear practical >benefits of using LVM, other than reducing the possible >future need to sym-link directories onto other file- >systems? Not all applications perform properly when symbolic links are used in this fashion. Hard drives can be added and removed from the volume group(s) as needed to increase capacity and remove old drives. Logical volumes or parts of them can be resized smaller or larger and moved between and within physical volumes to facilitate removal of a drive or act on a performance consideration. Sincerely, Ken Fuchs <kfuchs@winternet.com> _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
