On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:06:03PM +0100, Luca Berra wrote:
this won't help if the device is not yet opened by md i posted a patch to this list that checks for an md superblock. i am pushing for consideration of this approach.
One of the problems with LVM1 was that there was far too much hard coded behaviour such as this.
This is a good point, but:
The current LVM2 behaviour is confusing for users that upgrade from 2.4/lvm1 to 2.6/lvm2 so i would like to address it.
LVM2 already code already contains exceptions for MD devices.
since we have a configuration file we could add a configuration switch for ignoring devices with md superblocks (possibly defaulting to ignore, which is what users expect)
WDYT?
L.
_______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
