On Friday 06 June 2003 04:25 pm, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: > why not go for a recent -ac kernel and skip patching :) > ( in -ac are included both xfs and dm ) > > and someone posted a dm-patch against xfs kernel on the list I played with 2.4.20 + xfs + vfs lock + lvm2, plus some patches I made to output snapshot usage in 512-byte increments. While the patches don't apply, per se, it's mostly because patch isn't smart enough to notice the code moving around. I think there were like 1 or 2 .reg files, with maybe two trivial fixes each. So merging manually isn't bad, e.g. if you don't want any of the other -ac changes. -- GPG: 03EE 9EB8 E500 874A F509 7B95 9B9A 84A1 26E9 4F79 http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~jhs/public_key.gpg
Attachment:
pgp00490.pgp
Description: signature
