"Gonyou, Austin" wrote: > Yeah..there's no linking or anything. One is a hardware vendor, the other is > a software vendor. True. But when I look for something "like" a SAN for Linux, GFS would be one product I would consider. In fact, we were considering GFS and an EMC SAN for a project recently (until it got canned). I guess I was thinking about this project when I made the comment. Sorry about that. Jeff Layton Lockheed-Martin > > > -- > Austin Gonyou > Systems Architect, CCNA > Coremetrics, Inc. > Phone: 512-796-9023 > email: austin@coremetrics.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) [mailto:ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it] > > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 3:43 AM > > To: 'linux-lvm@sistina.com' > > Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] LVM and SPL > > > > > > > I agree that Sistina may be in a very akward position and I > > > think it is > > > a very good thing for them to change the license on GFS. They have > > > to compete with the spector of EMC looming over them (I tried to > > > convince Lockheed to give up on EMC and a different route without > > > any luck. Their reason? "Because they're EMC!"). > > > > Actually, EMC and GFS are different things AFAIK. EMC provides you > > with virtual disks over FC, you still have to use them. > > I don't see why you shouldn't be able to run GFS over an EMC-provided > > virtual disk. > > > > -- > > /kinkie > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-lvm mailing list > > linux-lvm@sistina.com > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
