RE: [linux-lvm] LVM and SPL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yeah..there's no linking or anything. One is a hardware vendor, the other is
a software vendor.

-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@coremetrics.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) [mailto:ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it]
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 3:43 AM
> To: 'linux-lvm@sistina.com'
> Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] LVM and SPL
> 
> 
> > I agree that Sistina may be in a very akward position and I 
> > think it is
> > a very good thing for them to change the license on GFS. They have
> > to compete with the spector of EMC looming over them (I tried to
> > convince Lockheed to give up on EMC and a different route without
> > any luck. Their reason? "Because they're EMC!").
> 
> Actually, EMC and GFS are different things AFAIK. EMC provides you
> with virtual disks over FC, you still have to use them.
> I don't see why you shouldn't be able to run GFS over an EMC-provided
> virtual disk.
> 
> -- 
> 	/kinkie 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux