Re: IT8620E/IT8623E vs. IT8603E

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:59:47PM +0000, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Guenter Roeck <linux <at> roeck-us.net> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:50:43PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:39:02 +0100, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> > > > Asus has no information about IT8620E.
> > > 
> > > For the record: the IT8620E turns out to be a custom chipset made by
> > > ITE for Gigabyte, so it is no surprise that Asus had no information
> > > about it. It also explains why the part number doesn't show up on ITE's
> > > website.
> > > 
> > Do we know enough about the chip to add support for it ?
> > 
> > I have a patch adding experimental support for it, but of course
> > there is a lot of guesswork involved.
> > 
> > Guenter
> 
> Is this still an open issue that needs testing? I have a gigabyte mainboard
> with the IT8620E and am very willing to test this if it is helpful.
> 
Hi Sebastian,

Additional tests results are always welcome. Please try the driver at
https://github.com/groeck/it87.

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux