2015-01-07 17:16 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > INA219 uses the same mechanism and timing as used by INA209. This way > it is easily possible to extend the driver to support the attribute > for every chip. But overall this uses the existing ABI (update_interval > is part of the hwmon ABI) instead of creating a new driver specific > attribute. Yes, that is quite important. > > The additional "overhead" is just to use different numbers and a > different attribute name, so I don't really understand your concern. My concern is that it seems less clear this way, but I understand the priorities. Ok, I'll get back to it tomorrow. Bart _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
