2015-01-07 14:22 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I think I know what to do here. Can you look into the ina209 driver ? > It uses update_interval and calculates the number of samples to use from it. > The ina226 datasheet suggests that we can do the same, combined with the > conversion time configuration. We would have to use the default conversion > time of 1.1ms for that to make sense, but that is what it is today, > so it would be ok. This way we are in line with the ABI and can still > configure the number of averages. > Just to make sure I understood you correctly: I should add update_interval attribute instead of avg_rate, accept the desired interval (as time) instead of the number of averages and - already having the conversion time hardcoded to 1.1 ms - calculate the averaging rate? Isn't this an overkill for what we're trying to implement? I know it's for the sake of staying uniform with already existing interface of ina209 but on the other hand these devices aren't quite the same. Bart _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
