Hi Mike, On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:32:33 -0600, Mike Dixon wrote: > I have NOT installed a separate lm85 driver. I will gladly test your patch. I have posted the patch yesterday. I have also made a standalone driver available at: http://jdelvare.nerim.net/devel/lm-sensors/drivers/lm85/ For installation instructions, see: http://jdelvare.nerim.net/devel/lm-sensors/drivers/INSTALL > *System Info:*System: Sunware 0073351-01 05/16/2007 [SE7230NH1LX] > Board: Intel Corporation SE7230NH1LX The datasheet says that hardware monitoring is implemented by the LPC Super-I/O on this board. It doesn't say which chip it is though. But anyway this is in contradiction with the theory that you have one LM85-compatible chip on the board. > *Kernel Version*: > > 2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.i686 > > > *sensors-detect output (not sure if you wanted the whole thing or just the > summary):* > > Driver `lm85': > * Bus `Radeon i2c bit bus DVI_DDC' > Busdriver `drm', I2C address 0x2e > Chip `lm85' (confidence: 6) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 3000' > Busdriver `i2c_i801', I2C address 0x2c > Chip `lm85' (confidence: 6) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 3000' > Busdriver `i2c_i801', I2C address 0x2e > Chip `lm85' (confidence: 6) You did not rmmod the lm85 driver before running the script, as I asked. That make the above output useless (sensors-detect had to blindly trust the detection done by the lm85 driver, which we know is wrong.) So you can do it all again. And yes I would prefer the whole output. > *i2c dumps:* > Only the '0 0x2e' i2c dump worked (pasted below). The other two yielded > errors: > > [user@localhost]# i2cdump -y 4 0x2c > /tmp/lm85-i2c-4-2c.dump > No size specified (using byte-data access) > Error: Could not open file `/dev/i2c-4' or `/dev/i2c/4': No such file or > directory > [user@localhost]# i2cdump -y 4 0x2e > /tmp/lm85-i2c-4-2e.dump > No size specified (using byte-data access) > Error: Could not open file `/dev/i2c-4' or `/dev/i2c/4': No such file or > directory That's kind of odd. What does "i2cdetect -l" say? What does "ls -l /dev/i2c*" say? > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef > 00: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 10: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 20: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 30: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 40: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 50: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 60: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 70: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 80: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 90: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > a0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > b0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > c0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > d0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > e0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > f0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX That's not a successful dump. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
