On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:58:18AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:56:53 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 09/10/2013 09:19 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > > kstrtol() returns appropriate error values. Use those instead of > > > hardcoding. Silences several sparse messages of following type: > > > "why not propagate 'result' from kstrtol() instead of (-22)?" > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Series is compile tested. > > > > Series looks good to me. I have applied all five patches. > > I agree, all look good. Thanks Sachin! > > > Jean, please let me know if you want to take any; otherwise I'll push > > it all to Linus around Thursday. > > You can pick them all. That being said I don't think there is any hurry > to push them to Linus, they are all cleanups, not actual bug fixes. > That was more to get it in before -rc1. But you are right, there is no hurry. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
