On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:56:53 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/10/2013 09:19 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > > kstrtol() returns appropriate error values. Use those instead of > > hardcoding. Silences several sparse messages of following type: > > "why not propagate 'result' from kstrtol() instead of (-22)?" > > > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Series is compile tested. > > Series looks good to me. I have applied all five patches. I agree, all look good. Thanks Sachin! > Jean, please let me know if you want to take any; otherwise I'll push > it all to Linus around Thursday. You can pick them all. That being said I don't think there is any hurry to push them to Linus, they are all cleanups, not actual bug fixes. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
