No ... those are separate drivers, and different sensors. Also, the coretemp
reading is not really that exact. Especially at low temperatures it can be quite
a bit off, as far as I remember by 10 degrees C or more. It is more accurate at
very high temperatures.
I see, interesting - for some reason I always thought the Intel censors
are more accurate (judging by their measurements, because when I place a
load on that machine, both Intel CPU readings jump, but the f71882fg
driver barely moves a degree or two and stays in line with the rest of
the sensors, which doesn't really makes sense - when the CPU is under
load its temperature should rise rapidly).
Also, keep in mind that you have a different chip. pwm3_auto_channels_pwm
means something completely different on the f71882fg. For that chip, it is
not a bit map, but the temperature sensor index. 1..4 in pwmX_auto_channels_pwm
reflects temp[1..4]_input.
I am totally confused now! :-\
The driver has only 3 temperature readings: temp[1..3]_input,
corresponding to CPU (single censor, even though I've got 2 cores) and 2
motherboard readings (one on the PC board extension card and another one
on the main board itself).
So, I have the following values by default:
pwm1_auto_channels_pwm = 1 (1 binary - fan1)
pwm2_auto_channels_pwm = 2 (10 binary - fan2)
pwm3_auto_channels_pwm = 4 (100 binary - fan3)
Makes perfect sense since I do not have a 4th temperature reading
anywhere on the system, unless you take into account the coretemp
driver, which is in a different subdirectory: hwmon0 and not hwmon1 as
the f71882fg driver is.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
