Salut Jean,
Am 24.03.2012 um 08:05 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> Hallo Björn,
>
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:24:58 +0100, Björn Gerhart wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2012 um 22:02 schrieb Jean Delvare:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:43:15 +0100, Bjoern Gerhart wrote:
>>>> 2012/3/8 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> Assume all three are compatible and have the same functionality.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Tested-by: Bjoern Gerhart <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Care to share the output of "sensors" with us?
>>>
>> Sure. To be more precise, I tested with an IT8783 chip configured and wired by the hardware team at the company I'm working for on a proprietary mainboard. With the sensors.conf created therefore, the sensors output looks like this:
>>
>> [root@localhost ~]# LANG=C sensors
>> it8783-isa-0a10
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> CPU Core: +1.15 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.70 V)
>> +1.50V: +1.50 V (min = +1.10 V, max = +1.90 V)
>> +3.30V: +3.38 V (min = +2.70 V, max = +4.00 V)
>> +12.0V: +12.16 V (min = +10.69 V, max = +13.70 V)
>> -12.0V: -11.95 V (min = -13.68 V, max = -10.30 V)
>> +1.10V: +1.12 V (min = +0.90 V, max = +1.22 V)
>> VBat: +3.09 V
>> Fan1: 1662 RPM (min = 300 RPM)
>> PSU: 1245 RPM (min = 500 RPM)
>> Board T.: +30.0 C (low = +0.0 C, high = +55.0 C) sensor = thermal diode
>> CPU T.: +47.0 C (low = +0.0 C, high = +63.0 C) sensor = thermal diode
>>
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> Core 0: +40.0 C (high = +86.0 C, crit = +100.0 C)
>> Core 1: +43.0 C (high = +86.0 C, crit = +100.0 C)
>>
>>
>> These are about the same values as the "Hardware Monitor" section at the BIOS setup shows also. So all values look reasonable.
>
> Thanks. Can we see the configuration file associated with this? What I
> am particularly interested in are in3, in7 and in8 (Vbat) as they are
> treated specially by the chip and the driver.
>
Ok. in3 gets ignored, maybe not wired on that design. in7 and in8 don't get computed.
chip "it8783-isa-0a10"
#=== voltages
label in0 "CPU Core"
compute in0 @, @
set in0_min 0.7
set in0_max 1.7
label in1 "+1.50V"
compute in1 @,@
set in1_min 1.1
set in1_max 1.9
label in2 "+3.30V"
compute in2 @, @
set in2_min 2.7
set in2_max 4.0
label in4 "+12.0V"
compute in4 ((30/10) +1)*@ , @/((30/10) +1)
set in4_min 10.7
set in4_max 13.7
label in6 "-12.0V"
compute in6 (1+232/56)*@ - 4.096*232/56, (@ + 4.096*232/56)/(1+232/56)
set in6_min -13.7
set in6_max -10.3
label in7 "+1.10V"
set in7_min 0.89
set in7_max 1.21
label in8 "VBat"
ignore in3
ignore in5
ignore vid
#=== temps
label temp2 "Board T."
set temp2_min 0
set temp2_max 55
label temp3 "CPU T."
compute temp3 100+@,-1*(100-@)
set temp3_min 0
set temp3_max 63
ignore temp1
ignore temp4
#=== fans
label fan1 "Fan1"
set fan1_min 300
label fan3 "PSU"
set fan3_min 500
ignore fan2
ignore fan4
>> In general, for future Tested-bys: does it make sense to append a kind of test report (like the above one) directly after the Tested-by statement, or should it be located in a separate mail?
>
> Yes, test results are always welcome, and including them in the same
> e-mail is fine.
>
ok, perfect ;-)
Björn
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
