Hi Jean, Am 23.03.2012 um 22:02 schrieb Jean Delvare: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:43:15 +0100, Bjoern Gerhart wrote: >> 2012/3/8 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Assume all three are compatible and have the same functionality. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Bjoern Gerhart <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Care to share the output of "sensors" with us? > Sure. To be more precise, I tested with an IT8783 chip configured and wired by the hardware team at the company I'm working for on a proprietary mainboard. With the sensors.conf created therefore, the sensors output looks like this: [root@localhost ~]# LANG=C sensors it8783-isa-0a10 Adapter: ISA adapter CPU Core: +1.15 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.70 V) +1.50V: +1.50 V (min = +1.10 V, max = +1.90 V) +3.30V: +3.38 V (min = +2.70 V, max = +4.00 V) +12.0V: +12.16 V (min = +10.69 V, max = +13.70 V) -12.0V: -11.95 V (min = -13.68 V, max = -10.30 V) +1.10V: +1.12 V (min = +0.90 V, max = +1.22 V) VBat: +3.09 V Fan1: 1662 RPM (min = 300 RPM) PSU: 1245 RPM (min = 500 RPM) Board T.: +30.0 C (low = +0.0 C, high = +55.0 C) sensor = thermal diode CPU T.: +47.0 C (low = +0.0 C, high = +63.0 C) sensor = thermal diode coretemp-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +40.0 C (high = +86.0 C, crit = +100.0 C) Core 1: +43.0 C (high = +86.0 C, crit = +100.0 C) These are about the same values as the "Hardware Monitor" section at the BIOS setup shows also. So all values look reasonable. In general, for future Tested-bys: does it make sense to append a kind of test report (like the above one) directly after the Tested-by statement, or should it be located in a separate mail? Björn _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
