On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:08 -0400, R, Durgadoss wrote: > Hi Guenter/Jean, > > > > I don't think we want to deal with this interrupt in coretemp at all. > > > This is all therm_throt's job. > > > > > Agreed. > > From the earlier mails, what I clearly get is that we don't want 'coretemp' > to deal with the Threshold Violation Interrupts. > In this case, I would submit the next version of the patch doing: > 1) Update the max_alarm by reading 0x19C and checking the status bits > 2) Since I see different opinions on max and max_hyst comparisons, > Should I do a check inside the store methods ? > No agreement -> do nothing, ie no check. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
