-----Message d'origine----- Hi, On 7/4/2011 9:33 AM, Kazuya wrote: > Hello, > > I am a bit stuck currently. I would like to know if you can help me. I > would like to access to the temperature of my processor. That what I > have already done .. > > If you need more information I can send everything you want. > > My system : > > root@teddy:~# uname -a > > *Linux teddy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 14 09:42:28 UTC 2011 x86_64 > GNU/Linux*** > > Other information : > > Shuttle SH67H3 – i5 2300 > > The last version of sensors detect gives : > > root@teddy:~# perl sensors-detect > > *# sensors-detect revision 5981 (2011-07-03 13:57:57 +0200)* > > *# System: Shuttle SH67H3* > > *# Board: Shuttle FH67* > > ** > > *This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need* > > *to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe* > > *and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,* > > *unless you know what you're doing.* > > ** > > *Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded > sensors.* > > *Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): yes* > > *Module cpuid loaded successfully.* > > *Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No* > > *VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No* > > *VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No* > > *AMD K8 thermal sensors... No* > > *AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No* > > *AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No* > > *AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors... No* > > *AMD Family 15h thermal sensors... No* > > *AMD Family 15h power sensors... No* > > *Intel digital thermal sensor... Success!* > > *(driver `coretemp')* > > *Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No* > > *VIA C7 thermal sensor... No* > > *VIA Nano thermal sensor... No* > > ** > > *Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to* > > *standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.* > > *Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): yes* > > *Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f* > > *Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No* > > *Trying family `SMSC'... No* > > *Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No* > > *Trying family `ITE'... Yes* > > *Found `ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors' Success!* > > *(address 0xa30, driver `to-be-written')* > > *Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f* > > *Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No* > > *Trying family `SMSC'... No* > > *Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No* > > *Trying family `ITE'... No* > > ** > > *Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common > interfaces* > > *through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other > things.* > > *We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it* > > *there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such* > > *interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI* > > *interfaces? (YES/no): yes* > > *Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... No* > > *Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No* > > ** > > *Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O > ports.* > > *We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is > usually* > > *safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have > any* > > *ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO): yes* > > *Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No* > > *Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No* > > *Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No* > > *Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No* > > ** > > *Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware* > > *monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works* > > *reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause > trouble* > > *on some systems.* > > *Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): yes* > > *Using driver `i2c-i801' for device 0000:00:1f.3: Intel Cougar Point > (PCH)* > > ** > > *Next adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at f040 (i2c-0)* > > *Do you want to scan it? (yes/NO/selectively): yes* > > *Client found at address 0x50* > > *Handled by driver `eeprom' (already loaded), chip type `eeprom'* > > *(note: this is probably NOT a sensor chip!)* > > *Client found at address 0x52* > > *Handled by driver `eeprom' (already loaded), chip type `eeprom'* > > *(note: this is probably NOT a sensor chip!)* > > ** > > *Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.* > > *Just press ENTER to continue:* > > ** > > *Driver `to-be-written':* > > ** ISA bus, address 0xa30* > > *Chip `ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)* > > ** > > *Driver `coretemp':* > > ** Chip `Intel digital thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)* > > ** > > *Note: there is no driver for ITE IT8772E Super IO Sensors yet.* > > *Check http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices for updates.* > > ** > > *Do you want to overwrite /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no): yes* > > *Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors* > > *for initialization at boot time.* > > *You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required* > > *kernel modules.* > > ** > > *Unloading cpuid... OK* > > root@teddy:~# modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721 > > *FATAL: Error inserting it87 > (/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/hwmon/it87.ko): No such > device* > > As you told me I tried modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721 > > IT8772E yes LPC (2011-06-10) Found on Foxconn and Shuttle H67 boards. > No datasheet yet. One request (Boris Hajduk). Support can probably be > added to the it87 driver. Try "modprobe it87 force_id=0x8721" and report. > > Thank you, > > Do not hesitate to ask me any question if you want ! > What distribution is this? root@teddy:~# cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l root@teddy:~# cat /etc/debian_version 6.0.2 root@teddy:~# uname -a Linux teddy 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 14 09:42:28 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux What is the output from the 'sensors -v' command? That should display what version of LM_Sensors is installed and what libsensors library version is used. root@teddy:~# sensors -v sensors version 3.1.2 with libsensors version 3.1.2 What is the output from the 'sensors' command? If the necessary drivers have properly loaded, that command will display various outputs root@teddy:~# sensors No sensors found! Make sure you loaded all the kernel drivers you need. Try sensors-detect to find out which these are. The 'it87' module should be present if LM_Sensors is properly installed. Also, the 'coretemp' module should be present if LM_Sensors is properly installed. Did you attempt to "modprobe coretemp" and observe what happened? root@teddy:~# modprobe coretemp FATAL: Error inserting coretemp (/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/kernel/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.ko): No such device Did you attempt to start the lm_sensors service to load the required modules? If you tried to start the service, what did you observe? root@ted:~# service lm-sensors start Setting sensors limits. root@ted:~# /etc/init.d/lm-sensors start Setting sensors limits. Thank you |
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
