Hi Guenter/Jean, > > I don't think we want to deal with this interrupt in coretemp at all. > > This is all therm_throt's job. > > > Agreed. >From the earlier mails, what I clearly get is that we don't want 'coretemp' to deal with the Threshold Violation Interrupts. In this case, I would submit the next version of the patch doing: 1) Update the max_alarm by reading 0x19C and checking the status bits 2) Since I see different opinions on max and max_hyst comparisons, Should I do a check inside the store methods ? Thanks, Durga _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
