Re: [3.0 regression?] coretemp driver output has seemingly broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:13:31AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:42:40 +0000 (GMT), Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > On Jun 28, 2011, Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > 
> > > I start wondering ... do you have any ignore entries for coretemp in /etc/sensors3.conf ?
> > 
> > > Or, in other words, what does the system report if you execute "sensors -u"
> > > instead of "sensors" ?
> > 
> > $ sensors -u
> > coretemp-isa-0000
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > Physical id 0:
> >   temp1_input: 37.000
> >   temp1_max: 80.000
> >   temp1_crit: 99.000
> >   temp1_crit_alarm: 0.000
> > Core 0:
> >   temp2_input: 37.000
> >   temp2_max: 80.000
> >   temp2_crit: 99.000
> >   temp2_crit_alarm: 0.000
> > Core 3:
> >   temp5_input: 35.000
> >   temp5_max: 80.000
> >   temp5_crit: 99.000
> >   temp5_crit_alarm: 0.000
> 
> I would be more interested by the output of:
> $ sensors -u -c /dev/null
> 
And I thought -u doesn't use the config file. One never stops learning ...

Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux