Re: [3.0 regression?] coretemp driver output has seemingly broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:20:58AM -0400, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > On Jun 28, 2011, R, Durgadoss <durgadoss.r@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > 
> > Hi Tashkinov,
> > 
> > I am looking into this issue.
> > Could you please provide us the output of (2)
> > 
> > 1)cd /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/
> > 2)grep . *
> > 
> > Also, Is you kernel booted with SMP option enabled ?
> > 
He would not see any secondary CPUs at all if SMP was disabled ...

> > Thanks,
> > Durga
> 
> Please, call me Artem :)
> 
> $ cd /sys/devices/platform/coretemp.0/ && grep .*
> 
> modalias:platform:coretemp
> name:coretemp
> temp1_crit:99000
> temp1_crit_alarm:0
> temp1_input:35000
> temp1_label:Physical id 0
> temp1_max:80000
> temp2_crit:99000
> temp2_crit_alarm:0
> temp2_input:35000
> temp2_label:Core 0
> temp2_max:80000
> temp3_crit:99000
> temp3_crit_alarm:0
> temp3_input:35000
> temp3_label:Core 1
> temp3_max:80000
> temp4_crit:99000
> temp4_crit_alarm:0
> temp4_input:34000
> temp4_label:Core 2
> temp4_max:80000
> temp5_crit:99000
> temp5_crit_alarm:0
> temp5_input:32000
> temp5_label:Core 3
> temp5_max:80000
> uevent:DRIVER=coretemp
> uevent:MODALIAS=platform:coretemp
> 
> I don't have any special boot options for my kernel. Like I mentioned in my original e-mail 2.6.39.2 kernel works fine here.
> 
I start wondering ... do you have any ignore entries for coretemp in /etc/sensors3.conf ?

Or, in other words, what does the system report if you execute "sensors -u"
instead of "sensors" ?

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux