On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:54:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:26 -0500, DarkNovaNick@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > # sensors-detect revision 5901 (2011-01-14 17:11:54 +0100) > > # System: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H67A-UD3H > > (...) > > Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to > > standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe. > > Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): > > Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f > > Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No > > Trying family `SMSC'... No > > Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No > > Trying family `ITE'... Yes > > Found unknown chip with ID 0x8728 > > (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors) > > The problem is more likely that the SuperIO chip used in your system is > not supported. If so, your problem doesn't have anything to do with > SandyBridge. This would be an ITE8728F, ITE's latest Super-I/O chip. Nick, can you confirm this by visual inspection? The chip should look like this: http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/3831/it8728fsmall.jpg -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
