On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:54:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:26 -0500, DarkNovaNick@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > # sensors-detect revision 5901 (2011-01-14 17:11:54 +0100)> > (...)
> > # System: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H67A-UD3H
> > Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write toThis would be an ITE8728F, ITE's latest Super-I/O chip. Nick, can you
> > standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
> > Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
> > Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
> > Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No
> > Trying family `SMSC'... No
> > Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
> > Trying family `ITE'... Yes
> > Found unknown chip with ID 0x8728
> > (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors)
>
> The problem is more likely that the SuperIO chip used in your system is
> not supported. If so, your problem doesn't have anything to do with
> SandyBridge.
confirm this by visual inspection? The chip should look like this:
http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/3831/it8728fsmall.jpg
--
Jean Delvare
Thanks, I checked and my motherboard did indeed have that chip. The only difference, if it matters, is that under the "IT8728F" mine had "1039-CXS" and "ZC46FBGB".
And regarding the sensors-detect script, I understand now. If anyone is interested, my Sandy Bridge processor would be model "0x2A" according to how that script does things.
Nick
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
