Hi Jean, While I have your attention :-) > Hi Jean > >>> Took a quick glance at the datasheet. This is a totally different >>> beast that is not even remotely compatible to anything we support thus >>> far AFAIK. It contains an embedded microcontroller (!) which handles >>> all the hwmon related tasks. The datasheet that I received doesn't >>> contain any information about the microcontroller other than a simple >>> block diagram. So at the moment it's absolutely a no go and even with >>> all the technical data we would have to start from scratch with a new >>> driver. >> >> Thanks Juerg for checking this. Can you please update sensors-detect >> with the device name and features, and also create an entry in >> wiki/Devices? So that other user with that chip know the current >> status, even if it's bad. > > I added detection to sensors-detect but I'm not too happy with the outcome: > Trying family `SMSC'... Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Yes > Found `SMSC SCH5627 Desktop Embedded Controller' > Â (but not activated) > > The chip shouldn't be probed at all since it's non-standard. Users > might get confused by the 'not activated' message and will ask how to > activate it. Is there a way to bypass the probing and just print a > message that there is no driver for this chip? Any suggestions on how to accomplish this? Thanks ...Juerg _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
