On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 10:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The modified define in kernel.org would only apply if pr_fmt isn't already defined,
> so that argument is not really correct. The real difference would be that you could
> then remove the individual pr_fmt defines from 211 files, and all users of pr_fmt
> without module name (ie those hard to read) would be easier to read/identify.
I think that's not a good idea for now,
though I agree with the general concept.
This is in kernel.h now.
#ifndef pr_fmt
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
#endif
A lot of the pr_<level> calls already include
some internal prefix.
Try:
$ grep -rP --include=*.[ch] -oh "\bpr_\w+\s*\(\s*\"\w+:" * | \
cut -f2- -d"(" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
You're suggesting modifying 100+ files to get the
same output used now.
I think doing something like this after some more
generally accepted agreement is reached on how best
to do it would be better.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
