On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:43:43 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:38:35PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > But first of all, I really would like the pr_fmt issue do be sorted > > out. I don't like the idea of having to redefine it in every driver, > > when it seems easy to avoid that. Joe? > > Agreed, especially since it doesn't seem to be used in many of the drivers. As I understand it, it's used silently by all pr_*() calls. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
