On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:10:23PM -0400, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tempX_emergency will be used by max6696. It can also be used for other chips > > supporting three upper temperature limits. > > > > Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface | 6 ++++++ > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface b/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface > > index ff45d1f..1ceb2b9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface > > +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface > > @@ -310,6 +310,12 @@ temp[1-*]_crit_hyst > > from the critical value. > > RW > > > > +temp[1-*]_emergency > > + Temperature emergency value, typically greater than > > + corresponding temp_crit values. > > + Unit: millidegree Celsius > > + RW > > + > > If we have two-level alarms: critical, then emergency, it is best to have > that written down than to imply it by "typically greater than corresponding > temp_crit"... > How about: Temperature emergency max value, for chips supporting more than two upper temperature limits. Must be equal or greater than corresponding temp_crit values. Unit: millidegree Celsius RW Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors