Hello, this is also a good idea, but what about the already existsing configuration files? This method would probably break already existsing fancontrol configurations? (i always could write my own python script, but i think the community prefers shell scripting for compatibility reasons?) Anyways i thought that just a simple patch by someone who does shellscripting would be very cool :-) Martin On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Ioan Rusan <ionica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello > > I am currently ported in C language. > this it will be the next issue. > my ideea was to make something like this (tell me it you like) > input0=temp1_input;min_temp=N;max_temp=N > input1=temp2_input;trigger_temp=N > inputN= temp2_input;trigger_temp=N > > > Martin Vool wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> i am writing to you because i want to ask you what do you think of my >> idea. >> Currently i can assign only one temperature sensor to a fan. In my >> setup i need to monitor 2 sensors and set the fan speed accordingly to >> a single fan. >> >> It should not be very complicated to implement this, and implement it >> so that the old configuration is not deprecated, for example: >> >> ... >> >> FCTEMPS=hwmon0/device/pwm1=hwmon0/device/temp3_input:hwmon0/device/temp1_input >> hwmon0/device/pwm2=hwmon0/device/temp2_input >> MINTEMP=hwmon0/device/pwm1=45:50 hwmon0/device/pwm2=40 >> MAXTEMP=hwmon0/device/pwm1=55:60 hwmon0/device/pwm2=55 >> ... >> or >> ... >> FCTEMPS=hwmon0/device/pwm1=hwmon0/device/temp3_input >> hwmon0/device/pwm1=hwmon0/device/temp1_input >> hwmon0/device/pwm2=hwmon0/device/temp2_input >> MINTEMP=hwmon0/device/pwm1=45 hwmon0/device/pwm1=50 hwmon0/device/pwm2=40 >> MAXTEMP=hwmon0/device/pwm1=55 hwmon0/device/pwm1=60 hwmon0/device/pwm2=55 >> >> >> i personally would prefer the first, since it is more clear on what is >> going on. >> >> When the script calculates the speeds it simply has to look what is >> the highest RPM required for the monitored sensor. >> >> Since i am not used to program in shellscripts i wanted to know if you >> would like to implement this? If not then i would give it a shot, but >> the code probably wouldn't be very pretty... >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> Martin Vool >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lm-sensors mailing list >> lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors >> >> > > -- Martin Vool Privaat Disain OÜ Tel. +372 555 69 474 martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.privaatdisain.ee _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
