On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:58:14 -0800, Chris Verges wrote: > > Wouldn't it make sense to make use of hardware monitoring interfaces so > > lm_sensors could handle the sensor information? (added to CC) > > > > This would also be a good reason to have the driver on kernel side > > rather than somewhere in userspace. > > Hi Bruno, > > I agree. However, I've had other drivers in the past been pooh-pooh'd by the lm-sensors maintainers because they don't seem to fit exactly what the lm-sensors folks want in a driver. Unfortunately, I seem to be bad at understanding the purpose of lm-sensors. :-) I'd like to get their approval before any work is done to migrate over to lm-sensors. I can see that you tried to submit a driver for an accelerometer chip. This indeed did not quite fit in the hwmon subsystem (although for historical and unfortunate reasons we have a couple of them sitting there at the moment... they should really go away!) Temperature sensors definitely fit in the hwmon subsystem. Humidity sensors... why not, we have already one. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
