Re: [PATCH] linux-2.6.32-directemp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:58:14 -0800, Chris Verges wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make sense to make use of hardware monitoring interfaces so
> > lm_sensors could handle the sensor information? (added to CC)
> >
> > This would also be a good reason to have the driver on kernel side
> > rather than somewhere in userspace.
> 
> Hi Bruno,
> 
> I agree.  However, I've had other drivers in the past been pooh-pooh'd by the lm-sensors maintainers because they don't seem to fit exactly what the lm-sensors folks want in a driver.  Unfortunately, I  seem to be bad at understanding the purpose of lm-sensors.  :-)  I'd like to get their approval before any work is done to migrate over to lm-sensors.

I can see that you tried to submit a driver for an accelerometer chip.
This indeed did not quite fit in the hwmon subsystem (although for
historical and unfortunate reasons we have a couple of them sitting
there at the moment... they should really go away!)

Temperature sensors definitely fit in the hwmon subsystem.

Humidity sensors... why not, we have already one.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux