> Wouldn't it make sense to make use of hardware monitoring interfaces so
> lm_sensors could handle the sensor information? (added to CC)
>
> This would also be a good reason to have the driver on kernel side
> rather than somewhere in userspace.
Hi Bruno,
I agree. However, I've had other drivers in the past been pooh-pooh'd by the lm-sensors maintainers because they don't seem to fit exactly what the lm-sensors folks want in a driver. Unfortunately, I seem to be bad at understanding the purpose of lm-sensors. :-) I'd like to get their approval before any work is done to migrate over to lm-sensors.
Thanks,
Chris
P.S. Sorry for any odd formatting with these e-mails. I'm stuck in Exchange hell.
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
