ECS GeForce 6100 PM-M2 - labels/calculations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Ben  :-)

It's been a while and none of the experts have responded to you so I'll chip
in.

It is not unusual for motherboard designers to leave several I/O chip pins
unconnected so your hypotheses about "Fake" temp and SYSFAN RPM are probably
correct.

If your K8 CPU is revision F or G, the CPU core temperatures are not usable.
In AMD's "Revision Guide for AMD NPT Family 0Fh Processors" it says "The
internal thermal sensor ... is inaccurate".  This may be the reason for many
reports of k8temp giving absurdly low CPU core temperatures and for there
being no generally accepted computation to derive actual temperature from
the raw data.  The workaround is to ignore core temperatures and use the CPU
case temperature as was done before core temperatures were available.

If your K8 CPU is a later revision the core temperatures are usable but not
intuitive.  The temp for each CPU core is the average of its two sensor
circuits _plus an offset value_.  For details, including sample lm-sensors
configuration, see
http://forums.opensuse.org/archives/sls-archives/archives-suse-linux/archive
s-hardware-support/381563-lm-sensors-2.html#post1793098.

cpu0_vid is (was?) not dynamic under the current lm-sensors implementation;
the value shown is the value at start up.

Best

Charles

-----Original Message-----
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:28:40 +0000
From: Ben Norwood <mittfh at googlemail.com>
Subject:  ECS GeForce 6100 PM-M2 - labels/calculations
To: lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org
Message-ID: <49BE37E8.90301 at googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

My Motherboard is an ECS GeForce 6100 PM-M2, with a IT8726 I/O chip.
After extensive web searching, I haven't (yet!) discovered the 
appropriate labels or calculations for the readings given in sensors.
Vcore and VDIMM are based on readings from the BIOS, the 3.3V label 
seemed logical, the M/B temp is based on Systemp in BIOS, and Fake Temp 
is so called because it reads a constant 25?C - even when I'm torturing 
the CPU! Talking of temperatures, they do seem a little dodgy - is the 
CPU really 10?C cooler than room temp, and the motherboard 10?C hotter?
Oh, and I have a fan hooked up to the SYSFAN header (which gives an RPM 
reading if I plug it into the CPUFAN header), but it looks as though ECS 
haven't connected the RPM pin to the chip :(

If anyone can make head or tail of this lot I'd be grateful!

[ben at LinuxBox ~]$ sensors
k8temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
Core0 Temp: +13.0?C
Core0 Temp: +3.0?C
Core1 Temp: +6.0?C
Core1 Temp: +2.0?C

acpitz-virtual-0
Adapter: Virtual device
temp1: +16.0?C (crit = +70.0?C)

it8716-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
Vcore?: +1.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in1: +2.48 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
VDIMM?: +1.84 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
+3.3V?: +3.31 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in4: +1.20 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in5: +1.15 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in6: +2.94 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in7: +3.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
VBat: +3.01 V
fan1: 2360 RPM (min = 11 RPM)
fan2: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
CPU temp: +16.0?C (low = -1.0?C, high = +127.0?C) sensor = thermal diode
M/B temp: +35.0?C (low = -1.0?C, high = +127.0?C) sensor = transistor
Fake temp: +25.0?C (low = -1.0?C, high = +127.0?C) sensor = transistor
cpu0_vid: +1.525 V




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux