Hi Hans, On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:52:01 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: > > While coordinating my work with the Fedora net-snmp maintainer I got > > attended that upstream us already working on this: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=AE77C0A0A0DC9B49BAA800A119E82EA207CD5D83%40EDM-GOA-EXCC-1A.goa.ds.gov.ab.ca > > > > > > However the upstream work is a complete rewrite of the sensors code in > > net-snmp, as I have no idea when that will be stable and I don't want to > > completely break the development branch of Fedora (quite a few things > > require net-snmp) I'll also be writing a patch against the current > > stable net-snmp release, I already took a look and the code is quite > > isolated, fixing this for the current stable net-snmp release should be > > quite easy. > > Scrap that, upstream has finished lm_sensors-3.x support and the Fedora > net-snmp maintainer has decided to backport the sensors infra changes + > lm_sensors-3.x.x support to the current stable net-snmp, patch available here: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/net-snmp/net-snmp-5.4.1-sensors3.patch?rev=1.1 This is excellent news. One less project for us to take care of :) > Shall I add this to the wiki? Its a bit intrusive. You can always add a link to the patch for interested people. Then every distribution will decide whether to apply it or not. A less intrusive patch for net-snmp stable would also be nice to have, but only if someone actually has the time to work on that (I don't.) Thanks and congrats to the net-snmp and Fedora folks involved! -- Jean Delvare
