Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:08:48 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Jean Delvare wrote: >>> So, are you done with your porting work? If so, and if you didn't find >>> any problem with the new libsensors API, is there any reason to delay >>> the release of lm-sensors 3.0.0 any further? >> I'm not done with my porting work, next on the list is net-snmp, which looks >> easy to fix, I'll take a shot at it tomorrow. Then we also have an xfce applet > > I am interested in net-snmp as well, so maybe we can work on this > together. Well, you'll certainly be quicker than me on the code, but I > can review your patch and push it in opensuse. > Hmm, While coordinating my work with the Fedora net-snmp maintainer I got attended that upstream us already working on this: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=AE77C0A0A0DC9B49BAA800A119E82EA207CD5D83%40EDM-GOA-EXCC-1A.goa.ds.gov.ab.ca However the upstream work is a complete rewrite of the sensors code in net-snmp, as I have no idea when that will be stable and I don't want to completely break the development branch of Fedora (quite a few things require net-snmp) I'll also be writing a patch against the current stable net-snmp release, I already took a look and the code is quite isolated, fixing this for the current stable net-snmp release should be quite easy. >> and kdelibs (although that might only depend on lm_sensors through net-snmp). > > On my end (opensuse), I have kdegraphics and kdeutils which depend on > net-snmp. Only kdebase depends on libsensors directly (for ksysguard.) > My bad I meant kdebase. > P.S.: Please remember to add a short comment to your wiki edits so that > others see what's happening. > Will do in the future. Regards, Hans
