Walt H wrote: > Goede, J.W.R. de wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:28:49 -0500 >> Walt H <walt_h at lorettotel.net> wrote: >>> This was tested on an MSI P965 Platinum MB. I installed >>> the svn checkout of libsensors3 and copied the section >>> from the f71805 to modify for this chip. The set >>> statements for the chip fail, so I'm not able to set >>> hysteresis or critical values on temperatures yet. Also, >>> on my MB, the BIOS hardware monitor only shows the CPU >>> Vcore, +5 VSB, +5, +12, NB and DRAM voltage, so I can't >>> vouch for the other inputs. >> Well, the 3.3V, 3.3VSB and Vbat inputs are all internally >> connected in the chip, so they should be fine. That still >> leaves us one voltage short though. >> >> >> The comments from the f71805 >>> indicate that in0 (+3.3) should be internally scaled and >>> need no adjustment, however, if that input is correct it >>> appears to be scaled in half by default, so I multiplied >>> it by 2. >> Ahha, if you would have looken at the epox sensors.conf I >> attched and am using for tested you would have seen that >> I'm scaling in0 there by a factor of 2, and a comment not >> to change this as its internally scaled. I guess the f71805 >> driver is doing the scaling in the driver already. Which >> makes sense. I'll modify my driver todo the same for in0 >> and in6 and in7. >> > Sorry, missed that.... Figured F71805 would be close. > >> Also Vcore is most likely connected to in1, as in1 is the >> only one which can cause voltage alarms. > > Makes sense. >> I think using the config below should yield better results, >> can you try this please? ALso please write down your BIOS >> readings till the last diget, assuming you have a decent >> powersupply the readings should be pretty stable, so maybe >> we can compare the last digits to find out exactly whats >> what. Because currently in2, in3 and in4 are all reading >> about 1V unscaled, which when using normal scaling factors >> could be any of: 1V 2V or 5.2V when scaled, so the lables >> currently apointed to them below are somewhat random ATM. >> >> chip "f71882fg-*" >> >> # Temperature >> label temp1 "CPU" >> label temp2 "System" >> ignore temp3 >> ignore temp4 >> >> # Fans >> label fan1 "CPU" >> label fan2 "System" >> ignore fan3 >> ignore fan4 >> >> # Voltage >> label in0 "3.3V" >> label in1 "Vcore" >> label in2 "Vram" >> label in3 "5VSB" >> label in4 "+5V" >> label in5 "12V" >> label in6 "??" >> label in7 "3VSB" >> label in8 "Batery" >> >> # never change the in0, in7 and in8 compute, these are >> hardwired in the chip! >> compute in0 (@ * 2), (@ / 2) >> compute in2 (@ * 2), (@ / 2) >> compute in3 @*(1+200/47), @/(1+200/47) >> compute in4 @*(1+200/47), @/(1+200/47) >> compute in5 @*(1+200/20), @/(1+200/20) >> compute in7 (@ * 2), (@ / 2) >> compute in8 (@ * 2), (@ / 2) >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >> > This looks good Hans. The Vcore is seems to be spot on now. It does > range, as expected due to freq. scaling, but it matches up with what > I've seen in the BIOS. All the rest look good as well. The ?? (in6) > sensor appears to be NB as that is what is set in the bios under the > "overclocking" menu. > > Also, tried booting without pnpacpi turned off and it worked just fine. > Current output is as follows: > > f71882fg-isa-0a10 > Adapter: ISA adapter > 3.3V: +3.31 V > Vcore: +1.14 V > Vram: +1.98 V > 5VSB: +5.05 V > +5V: +5.00 V > 12V: +12.23 V > ??: +1.26 V > 3VSB: +3.31 V > Batery: +3.17 V *** (spelling: S/B Battery) > CPU Fan: 1066 RPM > System Fan: 1469 RPM > CPU: +39.0 C (high = +85.0 C, hyst = +4.0 C) sensor = > transistor > temp1_crit: +100.0 C (hyst = +4.0 C) > System: +34.0 C (high = +85.0 C, hyst = +4.0 C) sensor = > transistor > temp2_crit: +100.0 C (hyst = +4.0 C) > Thanks for testing, I've added this config for the MSI P965 Platinum to the wiki, see: http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Configurations/MSI/P965-Platinum Regards, Hans
