On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:00:20 +0200 Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > Hi Bob > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:31:11 +0200, Bob Schl?rmann wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:20:52 +0200 > > Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote: > > > > > So please test this: > > > 1) checkout the 3.0.0 branch: > > > svn checkout > > > http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0 > > > 2) comment the entries for your chips int he table at the end of > > > lib/chips.c and in the table near the end of progs/sensors/main.c > > > > Note that this isn't needed if you give sensors the -g argument. > > This forces sensors to use the generic printing routines. > > How does "sensors -g" differ from "sensors -u"? I thought we would be > reusing -u for the generic printing. > The difference is that -u prints every feature, -g only prints feature types it knows about. So when adding some new special feature type, the generic printing routines won't show them (yet) but -u will. Don't know whether it's worth it to support this extra switch, but I wanted to change the behaviour of sensors as little as possible. -- Bob Schl?rmann
