Hi Ed, On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:00:32 +0100, Ed Lucas wrote: > I have also added a "tags" field in which you can add a fixed set of > tags to describe the file: so far I have thought of "broken", > "experimental" and "beta". Perhaps this goes some way towards emulating > your "unsure" database flag, Ivo? I went for the name "tags" rather than > "status" so that other info could be added with minimal api changes. > This is more for my sensors overlay work, so feel free to disregard it > if it doesn't fit your goals. Random idea: we could add an architecture tag to configuration files. There's no point in installing files for x86 motherboards on an x86_64 distribution for example. This would allow distributions to split the configuration files to multiple packages and only includes the ones they want. -- Jean Delvare
